This made my musicians dread working
with me. They would get frustrated every time I brought them a particular
version of a song and expected them to play it that way and only that
way, because that was the version I had choreographed. Naturally, they
preferred playing things the way they’d been playing them since before I was
born. This went on for a good few months until I became more comfortable with
the music, less anal about everything, and way too busy to choreograph at
home. So 98% of the time now, I’m
improvising, even when I’m doing a TV shoot!
Am I happy about that? Generally speaking, yes (though ideally I’d like
to be more rehearsed for a TV shoot). I
learned a very important skill and I can easily produce on the spot. I’ve also developed a “style,” so to speak—a
default way of dancing that is uniquely and identifiably mine. Having this ability is priceless, but it only
comes when improvising becomes part of your regular dance routine.
But what about choreography? Is it true that choreography isn’t “real"
belly dance, as many of us like to say? Is it too much of a crutch? A cheat?
Is it like training wheels on a bike, or like painting by numbers—to be
abandoned once we can stand on our own two feet? Is there nothing to be gained from this supposedly
western dance skill? The answers are
yes, no, and it depends.
Chances are, if you’re not Egyptian,
choreography made up a large part of your belly dance education. That’s just the way we do dance in the
West. We teach, learn, and perform just
about everything from ballet to ballroom by memorizing routines. It’s only
natural that we would apply the same pedagogy to belly dance. This
is especially true for those who aren’t even aware that NOT choreographing is an
equally valid option for belly dance, as well as for those who don’t know that choreography
is an alien concept for most Egyptian belly dancers.
There’s nothing necessarily wrong with choreography.
It helps get technique into our muscle memory, and teaches us how to transition
between steps. However I’ve been noticing
that our overreliance on others' choreographies
leads to a sort of copy-cat syndrome.
Rather than dissecting routines to understand the choreographers'
artistic choices, too many of us are content to just memorize and perform…memorize
and perform, until we all look like clones of each other. It’s getting even worse now that so many of
us copy one or two dancers who have become stars in the workshop circuit. It
seems that a lot of us believe that so long as we’re imitating a star, we’re stars
ourselves. But it doesn't really work that way. Just because we dance exactly
like someone we all know and love says nothing about our own abilities. If
anything, it stunts our growth as artists, as we never give ourselves a chance to
explore our own ways of moving.
Done properly, however, learning others'
choreographies *should* be like two people having a conversation. The first
person says something, which then prompts you to say something in response.
What you say will be related to and based on what the first person said, but by
no means would you echo them. Not only would that person think you're crazy or
immature, but that wouldn't even qualify as a conversation. By merely echoing
what a person says, you're effectively shutting the conversation down, not
contributing to it.
This is why it’s a good idea to reduce our
dependency on other people's choreography as much as possible. Creating our own
choreography, however, can be a useful tool in our artistic development. As a performer, I find that taking time to pre-plan
what I’m going to do to the music forces me to push my boundaries. Since I’m
neither distracted by the audience nor constrained by time, I can practice to the
same section of a song until I tame it, mold it, and make it mine. I can chew
it up and spit it out until I turn blue in the face--until I come up with
something that satisfies my inner artist and supersedes all that I normally
would have done had I only been given one shot at it on stage.
This is why I make sure I go back to the
studio. More often than not these days. Because even though I dance every
night, it's not enough in terms of artistic development. Improv certainly has
its benefits. But when you do it every night, your body gets used to doing certain
moves and combinations. In fact your improv can eventually turn into a default
choreography over time! The only way to break that mold is to use your time off
stage to create new material. This is why I go the extra mile and experiment
with different technique and combinations. (I suspect many star dancers do this,
though they'd deny it to the death. They want others to believe that their talent
is completely effortless and God-given. As if that somehow makes them better
than their colleagues who admit to working their @$$e$ off). The results are
rewarding, as my body shows me entirely new possibilities and creates new moves
that I then test on my audiences and students.
I also like using choreography as a teaching
tool... though most American dancers, convinced that "real" belly
dance is improvised, seem to prefer technique classes to choreography ones.
Personally, I find this wrongheaded. And a bit lazy. Yes, technique is
important. But studying belly dance is not simply a matter of learning steps
and then stringing them together any which way you like. Not in the beginning
at least. There has to be a logic to the way you combine your steps and
transition between them-- a logic that depends entirely on the music you're
using. This is true whether you're improvising or choreographing.
The best way to learn this logic is to study
others' choreography (providing they're good at what they do, of course). The
art is in the interpretation-- in the choreographer's "ear," so to
speak, not in the individual steps. This is especially true of those who have
years of experience dancing in Egypt.
I think it's obvious by now that this is
how I learned to belly dance. All of the classes I took, from Yosry Sharif in
New York to Raqia Hassan in Egypt were choreography-based. It helped that I had
years of ballet under my metaphorical belt-- the idea of utilizing the memory to
learn an entire piece wasn't alien to me, even if the new moves were. In fact,
this was how I learned technique--within the CONTEXT of a larger, meaningful
work of art. Little by little, after studying with many different teachers, I
had a acquired a pretty impressive technical repertoire, and developed a knack for choreographing my own pieces. This
has only become easier with time. Before, it would take me one to three months
to choreograph something! Now, it takes me one to three days.
Still, learning and producing
choreography is a challenge for many dancers.
Many of them ask me how to do it, or else protest that the whole concept
of memorization kills the spontaneity of belly dance. And it's understandable
that they would feel this way, as there's no shortage of authorities encouraging
dancers to write down choreography or engage in other mental exercises to
remember the sequence of steps. Let me respond to that by saying that this is a
completely misguided approach, and a fundamental misunderstanding of how
choreography should be made. If you have to rely on your memory to do your own
routine, then you're using your mind to create it, not your ear. You're using
your intellect instead of letting the music tell you what to do. Which means you're
imposing moves on the music that most likely don't fit and have no real connection
to it. Or, you're imposing movements that fit technically, but that aren't really the best choice for that piece.
On some level, you realize this, which is why you turn to your memory for help.
What should be happening is that the
music tells you what to do, not the other way around. When you surrender to the
music and let it take control, your dance choreographs itself. Meaning, your
body just knows what to do (providing you have a large technical repertoire and
a good ear). It responds naturally and organically. Actually it will probably
respond in almost the same exact ways when dancing to the same piece of music
over and over, thereby eliminating the need for memorization.
But what is your "ear," and
how do you learn to rely on it? Your ear is your musical interpretation. It's
how you envision what you're hearing and how you translate it with movement. The
only way to rely on it is to train it. You do that by listening to as much
Arabic music as you can, even if it's not Egyptian. Get familiar with and learn
to love the violin and the accordion. They are staples of Arabic music. Explore
all the ways your body could respond to these instruments by studying. Watch
videos of the greats of Egypt, both past and present (but don't always suspend
criticism, either). Take classes with those who have performed there. Then get
yourself in "same but different" mode. Come up with different ways of
interpreting things without transcending the boundaries of what is considered
acceptable for a particular musical phrase. And build your technique
vocabulary.
Once you feel you've gained a better
understanding of how the music works, approach each piece as though it were a
puzzle. Listen to it actively and passively until you can sing it and even
correct others who sing or play it incorrectly. Know its ins and outs, accents,
tempo changes, lyrics. Strategize. If there’s a part that’s really fast in the
middle, for example, it would be better to build up to it slowly rather than
making the whole piece fast from start to finish. Just for the sake of contrast
and depth.
Actually, I would give the same answer
to someone asking how to improvise. Only, I would add that one shouldn't be all
over the place. Just because you don't have a plan doesn't mean you need to do
every move you've ever learned. You may think that will make your dancing more
interesting, but really all you're doing is exercise, not dance. Dance is art,
and art requires some kind of coherency, some kind of consistency. You can't
attain that if you do a hundred different moves in one song. Rather, dance the
first sixteen counts. Try to remember what popped out so that you can repeat it
at different points throughout the song, but with minor variations in angle,
arm position, and level. But don't stray so far away that your audience can't
see the logic in your interpretation. And definitely don't be afraid of
repetition, within moderation of course.
Most importantly, whether you're
choreographing or improvising, hone in on the melody. The melody is what
differentiates one song from another, and it's what will really allow you to connect
your movements to the piece. This is why I emphasized paying attention to the
non-percussive instruments. The violin, accordion, piano, flute, oud, qanoon,
and even saxophone.... all are melody-creating instruments. And there are
hundreds of thousands of melodies, whereas there is a small and finite number of rhythms (maqsoom, masmoodi, saidi, sama'i, fallahi, ayoub, etc.) present in
every single piece of music known to the Arab world. So if your idea of dancing
is merely responding to the drum beat, you're not incorrect, technically
speaking. But it means you're missing out on layers of depth and artistry that can
be extracted from the melody. And it means your dance is generic. It could be
easily imposed on many other songs and fit quite well. Yet it will always lack
that special something that lets your audience know that THIS dance was created for THIS
music.
So important is the melody that in
Egyptian musician-speak, it's put in a category of its own and called "mazika," or music. Contrast this to
back home, where melody is understood to be just part of what comprises
music, along with rhythm and lyrics. Honestly, when your musical tradition is
built upon the genius of composers the likes of Abdel Wahab, Baligh Hamdi, Sayed
Darwish, Omar Khairat, and Sayyed Mikawi, you have every right to give their work
its own category. It's definitely deserving of it. :)
Whichever method you rely on the most, I
would suggest getting out of your comfort zone if you want to grow as an
artist. Challenge yourself. If you're a strictly choreographed dancer, try
improvising in your house or on stage. Keep trying until it's no longer
uncomfortable. If you only improvise, spend some time in front of the mirror
choreographing. Analyze others' choreographies to see how they interpret
instrumentation, lyrics, and transitions. Don't copy them obviously, but try to
understand their "ear." See if you can pick out flaws or improve on their
interpretation skills.
Other than what I've already mentioned,
there's really no secret to doing either well. Like anything, you just have to
do it over and over again until your body and your brain figure things out.
That's how I did it, and how a lot of other successful dancers do it. Sure, I
had taken some improvisation workshops, but I found them useless. The only
thing that worked for me was taking a stab at it every night at work, relying
on the repertoire of technique and combos that had become part of my muscle
memory as a result of learning choreographies. I discovered that I'm lucky
enough to have a good audience and be in a good mood, I might even come up with
some innovative material on the spot. That's when I most impress myself. It
doesn't happen all the time, but often enough for me to be pretty confident
when improvising.
Thank you for sharing, those were really valuable advices :)
ReplyDeleteA great read, and gave me hope that I can improvise more comfortably in the future. Also that creating choreography won't always take 2 months! Great food for thought :-)
ReplyDelete